|
Post by pickinduck on Dec 6, 2016 12:24:37 GMT -6
My brother, I, and our friends seen what I been calling shadow people when we were kids.
|
|
|
Post by pickinduck on Dec 6, 2016 15:29:19 GMT -6
"More opaque then solid"?
|
|
|
Post by pickinduck on Dec 7, 2016 16:23:29 GMT -6
I have actually ran into people having problems with the word opaque many times in my life.
|
|
|
Post by sherlew99 on Dec 7, 2016 23:07:53 GMT -6
They don't know the right definition, or are not sure they have it?
|
|
|
Post by pickinduck on Dec 8, 2016 8:01:55 GMT -6
It is more common of a problem then it should be. The question is why? Could it have something to do with the desire to use a buzz word? Why do they get it confused with translucent which is its exact opposite?
|
|
|
Post by sherlew99 on Dec 8, 2016 11:16:32 GMT -6
It could be a kind of buzz word phenomenon, but some people seem to be just naturally muzzy on the definitions of some words.
|
|
|
Post by pickinduck on Dec 10, 2016 21:29:02 GMT -6
RATS, they removed the video. I've always called what we seen then as shadow people because that's what seemed to fit best to me. I could see other people calling it other things if they were to see it. What you label something has a lot to do with what you do and don't believe in. I didn't call them shadow people at first. I didn't do that until after I heard about shadow people in the media. My brother doesn't call them that and I know he's heard of shadow people. He refers to them in terms like those strange things.
|
|
|
Post by sherlew99 on Dec 10, 2016 23:16:06 GMT -6
Hmm, I wonder if they'll upload the video again.
|
|
|
Post by sherlew99 on Dec 10, 2016 23:43:44 GMT -6
Ah ha, lookie what I found.
|
|
|
Post by pickinduck on Jan 29, 2017 14:29:37 GMT -6
I am getting more and more reluctant to call what I seen back then a Shadow Person because the definition of a Shadow Person seems to be changing.
|
|
|
Post by sherlew99 on Jan 29, 2017 20:06:57 GMT -6
What would you call it, then?
|
|
|
Post by pickinduck on Jan 29, 2017 22:33:20 GMT -6
I am still trying to figure that out. I'm sure they're not ghosts. They can interact or not interact with our would by choice of degrees. The one we seen back then when it knew we spotted it it ran into a closet shutting the closet door behind it. We ran to the closet and opened the door to find nothing. We didn't just look. We waved our arms around in it and felt the walls. One of the things that I've thought about over the years was that it passed through solid matter (the walls) but that it didn't fall through the floor. This occurrence happened on the top floor of an apartment building. It must be able to very precisely control its ability.
|
|
|
Post by sherlew99 on Jan 30, 2017 9:24:18 GMT -6
Yes, and I'm sure that accidentally falling through the floor would be rather embarrassing.
|
|
|
Post by pickinduck on Jan 30, 2017 9:44:31 GMT -6
I think that its actions showed fear and that maybe the technology that it possessed was a bit beyond its ability to use fully and correctly.
|
|
|
Post by pickinduck on Jan 31, 2017 12:35:56 GMT -6
We were kids at the time and this thing was not full human adult size. It was our size if not slightly smaller.
|
|